6. The system of repairing depressive classes by reserved seats in provincial and central legislators, in accordance with Clauses 1 and 4, is maintained until this comparison is defined by mutual agreement between the communities concerned. There was also correspondence between the Viceroy of India, Lord Willingdon, and the Governor of Bombay, Sir Frederick Sykes, who stressed the position of the government that could have appointed Ambedkar as architect of the Indian constitution, but he is not close to Gandhi. How can Dalits be separate voters? This is of course the British plan to divide India permanently, but Gandhi came to the rescue. The author tries to slip his point of view with unnecessary and unreliable facts. There is something going on in India to defame Gandhi, and the author is trying to play her part. Those who have already tried to cast Gandhi in the wrong color have all gone to dust. Let us respect our father of the Gandhi nation and try not to engage in these ridiculous and unnecessary acts. Ambedkhar is the true leader of the oppressed. Where Gandhi claims to be the representative.
Ambedkhar does not want power to be given to the untouchable, but if power is to be given, it must be given to all. In this respect, he wanted to have his own electorate. Where the real representative of the appointment casser are elected by themselves and their problems to stick to loksabha. This is what his vision of separate voters, but in the present the lure are in loksabha. if, since 2014, there has not even been a single sc problem, there has been no discussion in loksabha. Because no Hindu leader will talk about the problems of the sc, who knew very well ambedkhar, he asked for a separate electorate. Gandhi quickly hungry because he did not give his own electorate to untouchable, but you did not make this hunger quickly to stop the separation of India. I`ll let you do something to know its size… A single embrace will not change these many years of suffering. And this separate electorate is not claimed by ambedkhar by the British government…
A crude translation would be: „Hug our tight untouchables, oh my friends, or these wires will slip into unknown folds.“ One can guess from the above that Gandhi ji wanted an acceptance of untouchables to develop within Hinduism, instead of pushing them into the folds of a foreign identity. The first would take some time that he knew, but the second would create a lasting gap between them and the Hindus. The British have always believed in „sharing and domination,“ so it is not surprising that they offered a separate electorate to the untouchables, as this article mentions. Twenty years were quite long, and the British knew that this unique regime would most likely remain forever.